Ethereum Evolution: Insight into the Schnorr Code Removing from Bitcoin Core
In August 2016, the Bitcoin ecosystem had significant changes. The implementation of the SchnORR signature, which allowed a more efficient and convenient transaction signing, was removed from the Bitcoin Core-open code code based on Bitcoin. This decision caused both the curiosity of both enthusiasts and developers, forcing us to explore the reasons for this move.
Schnorr Signatures: Short Introduction
Before we go into the removal of the details, it is important to understand what Schnorr’s signatures are. Mihai Alisie’s developed in 2014, SCHNORR signatures are a type of digital signature that allows faster and safer transactions on the Bitcoin network. Unlike traditional public key cryptographic methods, such as ECDSA, SchnORR signatures use a simpler mathematical approach to test identity and create unique digital signatures.
Schnorr introduction in Bitcoin Core
The implementation of Bitcoin Core in the signatures of the Schnorr was a significant retreat from the traditional ECDSA -based methods used at the time by other cryptocurrency projects. Including the Schnorra algorithm, the Bitcoin network aims to improve the efficiency, security and scalability of the transaction.
However, some developers and users were concerned about the stability of the use of Schnorra’s signatures and the importance of security. Specifically, there were concerns that the introduction could lead to increased vulnerability to certain types of attacks, such as Layer 2 (2-L) purse compromise or double spending attacks.
decision to remove Schnorr code from Bitcoin Core
In November 2016, a patch was released to remove the Schnorr signature from the Bitcoin Core. It is reported that the decision was made by the Bitcoin Foundation, which is responsible for preserving and updating the Bitcoin Main Code since its inception in 2009.
There are several reasons that contributed to this decision:
1
Concerns about Stability
: Some developers raised concerns about the possible instability introduced by Schnorr’s signatures. By removing the implementation, the Fund’s aim was to create a more stable and expected environment for users.
- Scalability questions : Schnorr algorithm was considered unnecessary complexity in the scalability of the Bitcoin network. Removing it would allow the underlying technology to be implemented cleaner and efficiently.
3
Safety Considerations : Removal of Schnor’s signatures reflected the Fund’s priorities over other considerations.
Impact on the Ethereum ecosystem
Removing Schnor Code from Bitcoin Core has had a significant impact on a wider ecosystem. Ethereum, which is largely based on Schnor’s algorithm, was forced to re -evaluate and improve the implementation of the signature method to ensure its smart contract functionality.
The Ethereum team eventually decided to use a different approach to signing contracts, instead choosing a more traditional ECDSA -based method. This decision allowed Ethereum to maintain compatibility with existing tools and libraries that rely on Schnorr’s signatures, providing constant support and adoption throughout the ecosystem.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the removal of the Schnorr code from Bitcoin Core was a deliberate decision by the Fund in response to concerns about stability, scalability and security. The impact on the broader Ethereum ecosystem is clear: the transition to the introduction of different signatures has opened the way for further growth and innovation in society.
As developers and enthusiasts continue to explore new events in the Bitcoin ecosystem, it is important to remain informed about the underlying architecture and its variable landscape.